<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Church Management System Selection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/</link>
	<description>Christianity, Orthodoxy and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Mitry</title>
		<link>http://anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Mitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Hal, that is good to hear, something else I liked about ACS was that they offer diocese support and school administration software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hal, that is good to hear, something else I liked about ACS was that they offer diocese support and school administration software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal Campbell</title>
		<link>http://anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your and Jim&#039;s comments about ACS.  Our team has worked very hard to meet the needs of our clients. AS Jim said we have improved the web integration and have also done additional work on the user interface for the 2006 Edition of ACS released just last week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your and Jim&#8217;s comments about ACS.  Our team has worked very hard to meet the needs of our clients. AS Jim said we have improved the web integration and have also done additional work on the user interface for the 2006 Edition of ACS released just last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Mitry</title>
		<link>http://anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Mitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jim, it definitely was a close call for us between F1 and ACS, we are happy with F1 today and it suits our needs pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jim, it definitely was a close call for us between F1 and ACS, we are happy with F1 today and it suits our needs pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Walton</title>
		<link>http://anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anchorite.org/blog/2006/09/26/church-management-system-selection/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>I went thru this same exercise about a year and a half ago at my church.  My top 2 contenders were F1 and ACS and it seems like ACS check-in system and web interface were not quite up to what F1 offered.  I&#039;m not at that church anymore, but they recently made the switch to ACS and I still talk to some staff people there and hear happy they are with the training, interface and support.  I have talked with ACS recently, as well, and seen their newer versions and they have really made serious improvements all the way around.  Their web interface is very much improved and their check-in is as well.  F1 and ACS are both excellent choices, I just wanted to put in my 2 cents about ACS, since I have seen alot of improvement in their product in the last year and I know as a company, they are very much focused on their customers, both present and future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went thru this same exercise about a year and a half ago at my church.  My top 2 contenders were F1 and ACS and it seems like ACS check-in system and web interface were not quite up to what F1 offered.  I&#8217;m not at that church anymore, but they recently made the switch to ACS and I still talk to some staff people there and hear happy they are with the training, interface and support.  I have talked with ACS recently, as well, and seen their newer versions and they have really made serious improvements all the way around.  Their web interface is very much improved and their check-in is as well.  F1 and ACS are both excellent choices, I just wanted to put in my 2 cents about ACS, since I have seen alot of improvement in their product in the last year and I know as a company, they are very much focused on their customers, both present and future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

